Competitive Network Monitoring Tools

When exploring tools that rival SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, the focus shifts to specialized capabilities and deployment flexibility across modern IT ecosystems.

Cloud-native solutions like Atera and NinjaOne cater to MSPs with integrated RMM, ticketing, and multi-device oversight, while Auvik excels in automated topology mapping and SaaS health checks—ideal for dynamic infrastructures.

PRTG stands out for its hybrid adaptability, offering both on-premises Windows deployments and SaaS options, complemented by granular SNMP metrics and customizable alerts.

For full-stack visibility, Site24x7 bundles network monitoring with application and cloud performance tracking, whereas ExtraHop prioritizes security alongside traffic analysis through its SaaS model.

On-premises powerhouses like SevOne (appliance-based) and NetBrain (multi-server architecture) target complex network diagnostics, automating workflows and dependency mapping for large enterprises.

Splunk bridges performance and security analytics, processing machine data across cloud or self-hosted environments, appealing to data-driven organizations.

Key evaluation metrics include real-time discovery protocols, inventory automation, topology visualization, and cost-effectiveness—criteria met through free trials (14–30 days) offered by most vendors.

Ultimately, the choice hinges on whether teams prioritize scalability (cloud vs. on-prem), depth of SNMP/flow analysis, or integrated features like threat detection and cross-platform compatibility.

Auvik Network Monitoring: A Comprehensive Cloud-Based Solution

Auvik stands out in the crowded network monitoring landscape with its intuitive interface and robust feature set. This cloud-based platform offers a fresh approach to network management while providing seamless integration capabilities with popular platforms like ConnectWise Automate and Continuum.

Core Capabilities:

SNMP monitoring continuously polls devices for real-time status updates

Automatic network discovery identifies new devices and changes

Comprehensive inventory management tracks all network assets

Dynamic network mapping visualizes your entire infrastructure

Intelligent alerting system detects performance issues immediately

Auvik divides its services into two main categories: network monitoring and SaaS monitoring. For organizations considering alternatives to SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Auvik's Essentials package provides comparable functionality with several distinct advantages.

Advanced Features That Set Auvik Apart

The platform's real-time inventory and mapping capabilities showcase its performance excellence. Auvik automatically detects new devices and incorporates them into an interactive topology map, allowing administrators to click on individual components for detailed information such as bandwidth utilization.

Security and management features further distinguish Auvik:

Automated configuration backups and restorations protect against device failures

Integrated IPAM (IP Address Management) displays subnet utilization

Encrypted password storage eliminates the need to remember multiple credentials

Cloud-based deployment requires no on-premises infrastructure

User Experience Benefits

Visually appealing console with intuitive graphs for status monitoring

Browser-accessible dashboard available from any location

Customizable threshold-based alerts for server performance

Multi-tenant capabilities for managed service providers

While SolarWinds requires separate purchases for IP address management and other extended functionalities, Auvik includes these capabilities within its core offering. The cloud-based delivery model eliminates server maintenance requirements and provides accessibility advantages over on-premises solutions.

For businesses seeking comprehensive network monitoring with modern cloud benefits, Auvik delivers a compelling alternative that addresses the limitations of traditional on-premises monitoring tools while providing enhanced security, accessibility, and integration capabilities.

NinjaOne: A Unified Approach to System Management

NinjaOne, previously known as NinjaRMM, offers a comprehensive suite of system monitoring and management capabilities in a single unified package. This approach fundamentally differs from SolarWinds, which structures its offerings as separate modules for individual tasks. While SolarWinds provides comparable functionality, accessing the same range of services would require purchasing multiple SolarWinds products rather than the all-in-one solution NinjaOne presents.

The platform delivers several essential capabilities including:

• Automatic network discovery that regularly updates

• Comprehensive hardware inventory management with network topology mapping

• Complete software management with license tracking functionality

• Integrated help desk ticketing system with team and task management features

Designed specifically for Managed Service Providers (MSPs), NinjaOne competes directly with SolarWinds' MSP division marketed under the N-able brand. The MSP-focused architecture of NinjaOne provides distinctive advantages including multi-tenant capabilities that maintain complete separation between different clients' data.

Security is enhanced through credential management features that allow technicians to perform necessary tasks without requiring direct knowledge of account passwords for remote systems. This MSP-first approach makes NinjaOne particularly suitable for service providers managing multiple client environments, while those seeking SolarWinds equivalents would need to specifically explore the N-able product line for comparable functionality.

While SolarWinds operates as an on-premises solution ,

its architecture excels in monitoring local infrastructure with precision.

The platform’s versatility extends to multi-site and cloud-resource oversight,

enabling deployments that mirror cloud-centric tools like NinjaOne in scope.

NinjaOne, though designed for MSP workflows , adapts seamlessly to internal IT teams managing distributed networks.

Its cloud-native framework prioritizes remote site monitoring,

yet remains capable of overseeing "local" systems—

which, ironically, are treated as remote endpoints by the platform’s off-premises servers.

This creates a unique overlap:

SolarWinds, rooted in on-premises control, scales to hybrid environments,

while NinjaOne’s cloud-first approach bridges localized and dispersed assets.

Both tools converge in supporting complex, multi-location IT ecosystems,

despite their differing architectural foundations.

NinjaOne's foundation is its network monitoring service, essential for navigating and mapping the network for its operational requirements. In contrast, SolarWinds' flagship product, the Network Performance Monitor (NPM), stands out as the most widely-used network monitoring solution globally.

Both NinjaOne and SolarWinds NPM use SNMP to check network device statuses. Additionally, they both offer network traffic analysis, with SolarWinds providing this via its NetFlow Traffic Analyzer. Both systems utilize NetFlow, J-Flow, and sFlow for communication, support traffic shaping, and monitor virtual systems such as VLANs and VMs. SolarWinds combines these features in the Network Bandwidth Analyzer Pack, which includes both the NPM and NetFlow Traffic Analyzer.

For endpoint monitoring, both solutions support Windows, macOS, and Linux, and they also cover server monitoring. While both have application monitoring, SolarWinds' Server & Application Monitor is more robust in this area compared to NinjaOne.

NinjaOne integrates an automated patch manager and configuration manager, whereas SolarWinds offers these functionalities through separate packages. All SolarWinds tools, built on the Orion platform, can be accessed from a single dashboard, streamlining management. SolarWinds provides a bundled solution called the Hybrid Systems Monitoring Bundle, which includes the Server & Application Monitor, Server Configuration Monitor, Log Analyzer, and Virtualization Manager, but it lacks a patch manager.

Alerting mechanisms are standard in both systems. They generate alerts based on capacity utilization thresholds, typically set below full capacity to allow technicians to take preventive action. For example, a CPU threshold might be set at 75% utilization. Both systems enable custom alerts and easy adjustment of threshold levels.

A key difference is that NinjaOne includes a ticketing system, central to its task management. Alerts are channeled through this system, although they can also be sent via email and SMS. SolarWinds, lacking a built-in ticketing system, primarily uses email, SMS, and dashboard notifications for alerts.

NinjaOne's multi-tenant architecture makes it suitable for managed service providers, allowing the creation of subaccounts for each client. However, IT departments can use the platform without implementing subaccounts.

• Manages software on endpoints: Handles background installations and patches.
  
• Automated maintenance and patch scheduling: Supports a maintenance calendar.
  
• Multi-tenant architecture: Ideal for managed service providers.
  
• Web-based management: Accessible through any web browser.
  
• Flexible for IT departments: Sub-accounts are optional.
  

NinjaOne offers a 14-day free trial, and detailed pricing can be obtained through a free quote.

Atera distinguishes itself from other SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) alternatives by being a comprehensive support package tailored for Managed Service Providers (MSPs). This cloud-based solution integrates Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) functionalities with Professional Services Automation (PSA) modules, enabling technicians to manage clients' networks and MSP teams effectively.

• Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM): Manages network servers and applications.
  
• Automated Monitoring: Utilizes SNMP for network scanning.
  
• Performance Alerts: Issues alerts for SNMP traps and performance issues.
  

While Atera is primarily a cloud-based tool, it offers both endpoint and network performance monitoring. It also includes team and business management tools, making it a versatile solution. However, network discovery is an additional paid feature.

Atera's network monitoring capabilities are extensive, covering system management functions such as patch and software license management. This makes it more feature-rich compared to SolarWinds NPM, which focuses more narrowly on network performance. For the purpose of this comparison, we will concentrate on Atera's network monitoring features.

Both Atera and SolarWinds NPM leverage Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) for network discovery, live equipment statuses, and performance alerts. The key difference lies in their deployment: SolarWinds NPM is installed on-site, whereas Atera is a cloud-based service. This makes Atera particularly suitable for small MSPs, who can access full functionality without the need for on-premises server maintenance.

Atera is subscription-based, charged per technician, and offers monthly or annual payment options. Annual subscriptions come at a lower rate, but monthly payments provide better budgeting flexibility. This pay-as-you-go model eliminates the upfront cost of purchasing software, making it financially accessible for smaller businesses.

System alerts are crucial in network monitoring. Both Atera and SolarWinds NPM use SNMP traps to enable device agents to send status reports without waiting for requests. These trap messages are displayed as interpreted alerts in the dashboard, and can be forwarded to nominated technicians via email. Alerts are categorized by severity and shown as color-coded events, ensuring that administrators are promptly notified of any issues.

The alert system also integrates with visualizations, including graphs and color-coded charts, which log statuses and performance data for analysis. This simplifies network administration by providing real-time and historical data.

Atera is available in versions for both MSPs and IT departments, with four plans each. The core monitoring services are consistent across all versions, though the business services vary. This makes Atera more comparable to platforms like NinjaOne and N-able than to SolarWinds NPM.

• Cloud-Based System: Accessible through a web browser.
  
• Versions for MSPs and IT Departments: Four plans for each.
  
• Scalable Pricing: Charged per technician.
  
• Network Discovery Add-On: Requires an additional fee.
  

To experience Atera, you can start a 30-day free trial.

SolarWinds and Site24x7 present distinct approaches to network monitoring and management. While SolarWinds offers its modules as individual, perpetual licenses, Site24x7 bundles multiple tools into a single subscription plan. This means you would purchase SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor as a standalone product, whereas with Site24x7, you subscribe to a comprehensive suite that includes network monitoring among other functionalities.

Another significant distinction is the deployment model. SolarWinds primarily operates as an on-premises solution for Windows Server, while Site24x7 is a cloud-based platform, making it more accessible and scalable.

Key Features:

• Cloud-Based System: A SaaS package
  
• Network Discovery: Automatically creates a hardware inventory
  
• Network Topology Map: Generated from the hardware inventory data
  

Site24x7's network monitoring is part of a broader platform that encompasses various system monitoring and management tools. This comprehensive approach allows it to compete with multiple SolarWinds products, not just the Network Performance Monitor. Specifically, Site24x7's network monitoring service aligns with both the SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and the NetFlow Traffic Analyzer.

One of the standout features of modern network performance monitoring systems is their ability to autonomously populate tables with site data. Both SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor and Site24x7's network monitoring service offer this capability. They use the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) to gather status reports from devices, which also enables device discovery.

In the SNMP framework, the SNMP manager does not need prior knowledge of the network's equipment. It broadcasts a request, and all network devices, equipped with device agents, respond. These responses provide the SNMP manager with information about the devices and their connections, allowing it to build a detailed network inventory.

Both Site24x7 and SolarWinds utilize SNMP to create and maintain network inventories. From this data, they generate network topology maps. The status of network devices is also tracked using the information in SNMP responses. As new data is collected with each request-response cycle, both tools update their inventories and topology maps automatically, ensuring that any network changes are reflected in real-time.

When comparing SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer with Site24x7, several key differences emerge in their approach to network monitoring solutions.

SolarWinds operates primarily as an on-premises solution requiring Windows Server installation, while Site24x7 functions as a cloud-based service. This fundamental architectural difference affects deployment, maintenance, and scalability options for organizations.

Protocol support is crucial for comprehensive network visibility. Site24x7 edges ahead with support for NetFlow, IPFIX, sFlow, J-Flow, CFlow, AppFlow, and NetStream protocols. SolarWinds covers most of these but lacks CFlow and AppFlow support, potentially limiting visibility in certain network environments.

Alert management capabilities differ between these platforms. Both utilize SNMP trap messages for device monitoring and implement customizable traffic thresholds. However, notification methods vary: SolarWinds delivers alerts via pager, SMS, and email, while Site24x7 expands options to include voice calls and Slack integration, offering more modern communication channels.

It's worth noting that SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer isn't a standalone product but requires the Network Performance Monitor as a prerequisite. Site24x7, conversely, offers bundled subscription plans that include device monitoring, traffic analysis, network configuration management, and log management in unified packages.

Site24x7's cloud-based approach positions it as a direct competitor to Atera and NinjaOne rather than SolarWinds. This model appeals particularly to organizations seeking minimal infrastructure management overhead and predictable subscription costs.

For businesses evaluating these solutions, Site24x7 offers a 30-day free trial of their complete platform, which includes virtual system monitoring capabilities for virtualizations, VPNs, and cloud servers—features that extend beyond traditional network monitoring.

Comparative Analysis of Network Monitoring Solutions

PRTG’s modular sensor-based architecture offers a pay-as-you-monitor approach, contrasting with SolarWinds’ bundled solutions

Its SNMP-driven framework mirrors SolarWinds NPM’s core functionality but expands monitoring scope through customizable sensor activation

While SolarWinds segments features like NetFlow analysis into separate products, PRTG integrates flow monitoring via sensor activation

The platform’s Windows-centric deployment contrasts with cloud-ready alternatives, though its API ecosystem enables third-party automation integrations

Custom alert thresholds and multi-channel notifications (SMS/email) align with enterprise requirements, yet lack built-in remediation tools

A free tier for 100 sensors attracts SMBs, though complex networks quickly exceed this limit, necessitating tiered licensing

PRTG’s visual network mapping rivals SolarWinds’ topology tools, both supporting hybrid infrastructure monitoring (cloud/on-prem/Wi-Fi)

Absence of native Linux support and asset management features positions it as pure-play monitoring rather than full-stack IT management

Trial versions for both platforms enable direct comparison, though PRTG’s à la carte pricing model creates cost predictability challenges

Flow protocol analysis and predictive drive failure alerts demonstrate parity with SolarWinds’ premium add-ons without requiring separate licenses

The sensor economy forces strategic resource allocation – prioritizing critical infrastructure monitoring over comprehensive coverage

While lacking SolarWinds’ brand recognition, PRTG’s extensibility through PowerShell and APIs appeals to customization-focused teams

Hybrid deployment options (cloud/on-prem) provide flexibility absent in SolarWinds’ primarily server-based installation model

Ultimately, PRTG serves as a Swiss Army knife for monitoring purists, whereas SolarWinds caters to organizations wanting out-of-box full-stack visibility

ManageEngine OpManager stands out for blending accessibility with powerful network oversight, particularly appealing to teams seeking efficiency without excessive complexity. Its design philosophy prioritizes clarity, offering a dashboard that translates intricate data into digestible visuals for quick decision-making

Where OpManager truly differentiates is in bridging the gap between simplicity and functionality. The platform supports 8,000+ device types out-of-the-box, eliminating compatibility headaches in mixed-vendor environments. Automated remediation scripts handle routine tasks like backup configurations and failover triggers, freeing IT staff for strategic work

Real-time monitoring proves particularly robust, mapping traffic patterns through customizable network topology views. Administrators receive threshold-based alerts via SMS or email before bottlenecks escalate, with integrated ticket creation for ServiceDesk Plus users

While OpManager shines in mid-market deployments, enterprises might find limitations in distributed monitoring capabilities. The solution consumes considerable server resources when scaling beyond 5,000 nodes, requiring careful infrastructure planning. Initial template customization also demands technical familiarity, though pre-built profiles ease the learning curve

When contrasted with SolarWinds NPM, OpManager trades some depth for approachability. SolarWinds offers superior historical analysis through its PerfStack correlation engine but burdens users with steeper licensing costs and a fragmented module ecosystem. OpManager’s unified portal reduces context-switching, though lacks SolarWinds’ advanced NetPath dependency mapping

Custom reporting flexes to meet compliance needs, exporting SLA metrics and availability trends in auditor-ready formats. The platform integrates natively with ManageEngine’s ecosystem while supporting third-party tools through REST API webhooks

Ideal for lean IT teams managing hybrid infrastructures, OpManager balances cost and capability. The 30-day trial provides full functionality, enabling proof-of-concept deployments without financial commitment. Organizations prioritizing rapid deployment over granular customization will find it particularly compelling compared to bulkier enterprise alternatives

When evaluating network monitoring solutions, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) and SevOne stand out for their distinct approaches to infrastructure oversight.

SolarWinds NPM operates primarily on Windows systems or virtual environments, leveraging dashboards to transform raw metrics into interactive charts and topology maps.

Its reliance on SNMP, ICMP, and WMI protocols provides foundational monitoring, though advanced flow analysis requires an additional $1,795 NetFlow Traffic Analyzer module for full protocol support.

SevOne distinguishes itself through automated network device discovery and multi-technique data sampling, enabling rapid identification of failing switches or bottlenecks.

Both platforms prioritize visual analytics—SolarWinds through customizable dashboard widgets, SevOne via dynamic displays that map device relationships and traffic patterns.

While SolarWinds offers modular scalability at added cost, SevOne emphasizes real-time troubleshooting workflows to resolve network anomalies faster.

The choice hinges on whether administrators prioritize granular flow monitoring with expandable features (NPM) or require automated problem diagnosis in complex environments (SevOne).

When evaluating network monitoring solutions, deployment models and feature integration set tools apart.

SevOne distinguishes itself with an on-premises hardware appliance designed for high scalability in complex data center environments

Unlike SolarWinds NPM’s modular structure, SevOne integrates capabilities like NetFlow analysis directly into its unified dashboard

This eliminates the need for add-ons such as SolarWinds’ NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, streamlining traffic visibility for bandwidth optimization

Both platforms excel in alert customization but differ in philosophy: SolarWinds prioritizes context-aware notifications triggered by device health thresholds

Its alerts focus on critical failures, reducing noise through configurable triggers delivered via SMS or email

SevOne employs a threshold-based system, sending alerts through multiple channels including a mobile app when predefined performance boundaries are breached

While SevOne’s granular alerting suits large enterprises, SolarWinds offers simpler setup and prioritization for teams avoiding alert fatigue

In troubleshooting, SevOne’s hardware-centric approach rapidly pinpoints switch-related packet loss, ideal for sprawling networks

However, its upfront infrastructure costs contrast with SolarWinds’ subscription model, which scales through optional modules

Pricing transparency varies significantly—SolarWinds lists add-on costs publicly, whereas SevOne requires direct consultation

For traffic analysis, SevOne’s native support for flow protocols (NetFlow, IPFIX) outshines SolarWinds NPM’s reliance on separate purchases

Yet SolarWinds retains appeal for organizations valuing incremental feature expansion and intuitive alert management

The choice hinges on network complexity: SevOne for scalable, integrated monitoring in enterprise settings versus SolarWinds for modular flexibility and operational simplicity

NetBrain stands out as a powerful alternative in the network monitoring landscape, offering unique capabilities that differentiate it from SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor.

Unlike SolarWinds' traditional SNMP polling approach, NetBrain employs an innovative discovery method that builds mathematical models from live data and collects CLI data directly from connected devices. This fundamental difference allows NetBrain to detect and monitor devices that have SNMP capabilities disabled—a common challenge for remote management teams that typically requires site visits to resolve.

NetBrain's discovery mechanism provides comprehensive visibility across your entire network infrastructure, including devices that would remain invisible to SolarWinds' SNMP-dependent monitoring. This broader detection capability represents a significant advantage for organizations with diverse device environments.

The visualization capabilities in NetBrain are particularly impressive, featuring on-demand network topology maps generated from real-time data. These dynamic visualizations automatically update whenever network changes occur, eliminating the need for manual maintenance. While SolarWinds offers similar functionality through its NetPath Critical Visualization feature, many users find NetBrain's approach provides valuable topological insights.

When it comes to alerting and troubleshooting, NetBrain implements an integrated ticketing system that automatically triggers analysis when alerts occur. This automation provides administrators with dynamic network maps highlighting problem areas, streamlining the troubleshooting process. The platform also supports API-driven escalation, reducing response times without requiring manual email exchanges of log files—a critical advantage during potential security incidents.

NetBrain's path analysis functionality displays capacity and throughput statistics directly on link maps, similar to what SolarWinds offers when combining Network Performance Monitor with NetFlow Traffic Analyzer in their Network Bandwidth Analyzer Pack. Additional NetBrain strengths include detailed network inventory creation and comprehensive device attribute documentation.

One potential drawback is NetBrain's pricing transparency—unlike some competitors, the company requires contacting their sales team for quotations rather than publishing standard pricing.

Splunk: A Comprehensive Data Analysis Platform with Network Monitoring Capabilities

Splunk stands as a powerful alternative to SolarWinds, offering robust data analysis capabilities that extend beyond simple network monitoring. The platform's core strength lies in its ability to process machine data from connected devices in real-time, providing valuable insights into environment performance.

One of Splunk's distinguishing features is its proprietary Search Processing Language (SPL), enabling users to conduct real-time searches through collected data. This flexibility allows for customized analysis across various data streams.

Splunk's Architecture and Offerings

The platform is built on a modular approach with several key components:

• Base Data Processing Package: Provides framework for analyzing any data stream
  
• Splunk Observability Cloud: Available as a premium add-on
  
• Enterprise Security Package: Functions as a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution
  
• Infrastructure Monitoring Unit: Most comparable to traditional network monitoring tools
  

Automated Intelligence and Threat Detection

What truly sets Splunk apart is its sophisticated automatic detection capabilities. The system excels at identifying abnormal data patterns across networks and can recognize signature patterns of common cyber attacks. This proactive approach helps organizations address security and performance concerns before they escalate into significant problems.

The platform includes a dedicated Behavior Analysis Module that monitors for unusual user activity, enhancing security posture through anomaly detection.

Visual Interface and User Experience

Splunk's interface bears resemblance to SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, featuring informative graphs, charts, and a dashboard-based design. However, some users note that SolarWinds offers a more streamlined experience with smoother transitions between dashboard and individual views.

Alert Management System

Splunk provides comprehensive alerting capabilities with two primary approaches:

• Real-time alerts for immediate notification of critical events
  
• Scheduled alerts to minimize system performance impact
  

Users can create custom alert conditions to specify exactly when notifications should be triggered, creating an environment where intervention is only needed when truly problematic situations arise.

Deployment Flexibility

Organizations can implement Splunk through multiple deployment options:

• On-premises installation for Windows and Linux environments
  
• Software as a Service (SaaS) platform
  

Full stack observability features allow correlation of activity across the entire service stack, though Splunk's primary strength lies in monitoring from the server level upward rather than deep network device monitoring.

Considerations When Choosing Splunk

While powerful, Splunk requires significant configuration work. The base package serves primarily as a framework for building custom data analysis systems rather than an out-of-the-box network monitoring solution. Organizations seeking a dedicated network device monitoring tool might find Splunk's approach requires more setup and customization than alternatives like SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor.

Focused on threat prevention, ExtraHop provides a sophisticated network monitoring solution that helps users filter out unnecessary data and focus on critical information. The dashboard serves as the central hub for all monitoring activities.

Key Features:

• Advanced Network Scanning: Offers both security and performance monitoring.
  
• Predictive Alerts: Utilizes machine learning to predict and alert on potential issues.
  
• Hybrid Systems: Monitors performance across the network and into cloud services.
  

ExtraHop offers two primary systems: security monitoring and network performance monitoring. When comparing it to SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM), the focus should be on the latter. ExtraHop includes AI-based anomaly detection and alerts, which sets it apart from traditional monitoring tools.

ExtraHop's approach to network monitoring is unique, with a strong emphasis on data analytics. Users can view past usage data in various time frames, from daily events to weekly summaries. The ExtraHop Addy system, a cloud-based machine learning service, analyzes wire data to detect anomalies and performance issues, reducing the need for manual troubleshooting.

ExtraHop also features automatic device discovery, adding new devices to the monitoring environment as they connect. It supports over 50 protocols and almost all TCP and UDP systems, capable of handling up to 100 Gbps of traffic.

While ExtraHop excels in machine learning, its traditional network monitoring capabilities are not as comprehensive as those of SolarWinds NPM. SolarWinds NPM, though lacking in machine learning, provides a robust and proven network monitoring solution that has supported numerous organizations for years.

ExtraHop is highly advanced, but its AI features can be overly complex. In contrast, SolarWinds NPM achieves similar results through simpler methods, such as processing SNMP messages.

SolarWinds NPM Features:

• Continuous Network Inventory Updates: Automatically maintains an up-to-date network inventory.
  
• Automatically Generated Network Maps: Displays throughput data for each link.
  
• Immediate Root Cause Analysis: Identifies underperforming nodes quickly.
  
• Limited Monitoring Scope: Does not provide monitoring for systems above the network or network management tools.
  

Overall, SolarWinds NPM delivers a consistent and comprehensive classic network monitoring experience. While tools like ExtraHop offer superior machine learning features, SolarWinds NPM remains one of the most reliable and user-friendly network monitoring platforms available.

It's worth noting that tools like SevOne excel in NetFlow analysis, an area where SolarWinds NPM falls short, requiring additional payment for this feature. Nevertheless, SolarWinds NPM is highly appealing due to its ease of setup, autodiscovery, topology maps, alerts, and reporting capabilities, making it suitable for both small and large organizations.

What is a Netflix VPN and How to Get One

A Netflix VPN is a tool that enables viewers to bypass geographical restrictions and access a wider range of content by connecting to servers in various countries. This allows users to stream shows and movies that might not be available in their local Netflix library, enhancing their viewing experience with a more diverse selection.

Why Choose SafeShell as Your Netflix VPN?

If you’re struggling with a Netflix vpn not working due to geo-blocks or slow speeds, SafeShell VPN offers a reliable solution for accessing region-restricted content. Unlike outdated VPNs that fail to bypass